<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.6.39 (Ruby 3.2.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-boucadair-teas-ietf-slicing-overview-03" category="info" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.18.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="IETF Network Slicing">An Overview of Network Slicing Efforts in The IETF</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-boucadair-teas-ietf-slicing-overview-03"/>
    <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair">
      <organization>Orange</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <city>Rennes</city>
          <code>35000</code>
          <country>France</country>
        </postal>
        <email>mohamed.boucadair@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2023" month="September" day="18"/>
    <workgroup>Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling</workgroup>
    <keyword>slice specifications</keyword>
    <keyword>slice coordination</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 31?>

<t>This document lists a set of slicing-related specifications that are being development within the IETF. This document is meant to provide an overview of slicing activities in the IETF to hopefully ease coordination and ensure that specifications that are developed in many WGs are consistent.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>Discussion Venues</name>
      <t>Discussion of this document takes place on the
    Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group mailing list (teas@ietf.org),
    which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/"/>.</t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
    <eref target="https://github.com/boucadair/ietf-slice-overview"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 35?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>Various slicing efforts are being conduced within various IETF WGs (e.g., teas, idr, spring, ccamp, mpls, opsawg, 6man, and ippm) and areas (e.g., rtg, int, tsv, and ops). All these efforts are referring to the IETF framework that is developed by the teas WG (<xref target="slice-fr"/>), however there is a lack of a global visibility about these efforts and their interdependency.</t>
      <t>Also, there is a lack of cross-WG communications in some cases when a slicing-related specification is candidate for adoption or adopted by a WG. This lack of global view at the IETF level and lack of early cross-WG communications may induce some inconsistency. For example, some proposals argue in favor of specifying extensions to convey specific identifiers in packets. However, distinct identifiers are being proposed: slice identifier, NRP Selector, NRP identifier, VTN identifier, VTN resource identifier, etc. The need and relationship between these identifiers are worth to be discussed independent of the channels that are used to convey these identifiers.</t>
      <t>This document provides an overview of slicing activities in the IETF to hopefully ease coordination and ensure that specifications that are developed in many WGs are consistent, e.g.:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Position the various concepts: network slice, network resource partition, virtual transport network, etc.</li>
        <li>Clarify the need of the various identifiers introduced so far and soften redundant/duplicate uses.</li>
        <li>Harmonize the definition of relevant identifiers (length, encoding, usage, etc.) rather than having the specification of the same identifier repeated in many places. For example, current specifications  use distinct encoding length of the same attribute (variable, 16-bit, 32-bit).</li>
        <li>Clarify the relationship and co-existence of identifiers if more than one is needed.</li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="slice-fr">
      <name>Reference Framework and Architecture</name>
      <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices"/> is the authoritative IETF framework for Network Slices. It provides definitions for a slice-related core terms and specifies a framework for the provision
of Network Slice Services over networks that are deployed using technologies that are owned by the IETF (IP, MPLS, etc.). The document refers to such slices as IETF Network Slice or "the term "RFC XXXX Network Slice" (where XXXX is the number assigned to <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices"/> when published as an RFC").</t>
      <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices"/> provides a clear distinction between:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>the "RFC XXXX Network Slice Service" which is the service delivered to the customer and which is agnostic to the technologies and mechanisms
 used by the service provider, and</li>
        <li>the "RFC XXXX Network Slice" which is the realization of the service in the service provider's network achieved by partitioning network resources and by applying a set of mechanisms within the network.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>The RFC XXXX Network Slice Service is specified in terms of:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>a set of Service Demarcation Point (SDP),</li>
        <li>a set of one or more connectivity constructs between subsets of these SDPs, and</li>
        <li>a set of service objectives for each SDP sending to each connectivity construct.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>The service objectives can be expressed as Service Level Objectives (SLOs) or Service Level Expectations (SLEs).</t>
      <t>In some deploymenets, the underlying network can be customized to select a subset of resources that are suitable for the delivery of an RFC XXXX Network Slice Service. Such a customization can be achieved by creating a set of Network Resource Partitions (NRPs).</t>
      <t>In other deployments, RFC XXXX Network Slices can be hosted directly on the underlay network (i.e., without requiring any NRP).</t>
      <t>RFC XXXX Network Slices can be realized using existing tools (<xref target="no-extension"/>). The extensions listed in <xref target="cp-ext"/> or <xref target="dp-ext"/> are not required in such a case.</t>
      <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices"/> does not provide any recommendation about the technological means to realize an RFC XXXX Network Slice Service. These considerations are deployment specific.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="models-for-realizing-network-slices">
      <name>Models for Realizing Network Slices</name>
      <section anchor="no-extension">
        <name>Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.srld-teas-5g-slicing"/> describes a model for the realization of RFC XXXX Network Slices for 5G networks. This realization model reuses many building blocks that are commonly used in service provider networks, specifically:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>L2VPN/L3VPN service instances for logical separation,</li>
          <li>Fine-grained resource control at the PE,</li>
          <li>Coarse resource control at the transit, and</li>
          <li>Capacity planning/management for efficient usage of provider network resources.</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="flow-agg">
        <name>Using Network Resource Partitions (NRPs) and Slice-Flow Aggregates</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls"/> proposes a model that is inspired from the Diffserv model for the realization of Network Slices over IP/MPLS networks. Specifically, this model introduces the concept of Slice-Flow Aggregate which is defined as a collection of packets that are mapped to an NRP and are given the same forwarding treatment in a shared network. An aggregate can group flows from of one or more RFC XXXX Network Slice Services.</t>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls"/> also introduces the notion of NRP Policy that is used to trigger the creation of NRPs that will support a given Slice-Flow Aggregate. In some deployment schemes, packets that belong to a Slice-Flow Aggregate are forwarded by intermediate node along the appropriate NRP by processing an NRP Selector that is carried by these packets.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="optical-transport-networks-otn-slicing">
        <name>Optical Transport Networks (OTN) Slicing</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing"/> defines Optical Transport Networks (OTN) slice as an OTN virtual network topology connecting a number of OTN endpoints using a set of shared or dedicated OTN network resources to satisfy specific SLOs. OTN slices are considered as a technology-specific realization of an RFC XXXX Network Slice in the OTN domain.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="vpn">
        <name>VPN+</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn"/> describes a framework for providing enhanced VPN services based upon VPN and Traffic Engineering (TE) technologies. Enhanced VPN (VPN+) can be used for the realization of Network Slices. This document introduces the concept of Virtual Transport Network (VTN), which is a virtual underlay network consisting of a subset of network resources allocated from the physical underlay network, and is associated with a customized network topology.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="instantiation-in-service-providers-networks">
        <name>Instantiation in Service Providers Networks</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation"/> focuses on the instantiation of the RFC XXXX Network Slice Services in service provider networks using existing data models. In particular, this document describes the relationship between service models for managing the RFC XXXX Network Slice Services and network models (e.g., the Layer-3 Network Model (L3NPM, <xref target="RFC9182"/>), the Layer-2 Network Model (L2NM <xref target="RFC9291"/>)) used for the realization of the slices.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="structuring-network-slice-controllers">
        <name>Structuring Network Slice Controllers</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.contreras-teas-slice-controller-models"/> proposes an approach for structuring the RFC XXXX Network Slice Controller as well as how to use different data models being defined for RFC XXXX Network Slice Service provision.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sr-based-hierarchical-network-slices">
        <name>SR-based Hierarchical Network Slices</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.gong-teas-hierarchical-slice-solution"/> proposes a hierarchical approach for realizing RFC XXXX Network Slices in Segment Routing domain. The approach involves two levels:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>Level 1 Network Slices are realized using Flex-Algo.</li>
          <li>Level 2 forwarding paths are restricted in the Level 1 topology by using SR Policy and NRP-ID in the data plane.</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="realization-of-composite-network-slices">
        <name>Realization of Composite Network Slices</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.li-teas-composite-network-slices"/> investigates a set of scenarios for realizing composite RFC XXXX Network Slices (that basically involve other slices).  The document defines a new identifier, called Inter-domain NRP ID.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="applicability-and-mapping-scenarios">
      <name>Applicability and Mapping Scenarios</name>
      <section anchor="gpp-5g-end-to-end-network-slices">
        <name>3GPP 5G End-to-End Network Slices</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-5g-network-slice-application"/> focuses on the application of RFC XXXX Network Slices in the context of the 3GPP 5G slices.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="encoding-3gpp-slices-for-interactive-media-services">
        <name>Encoding 3GPP Slices for Interactive Media Services</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.jiang-tsvwg-slice-media-service"/> explores how IETF schemes (DSCP and UDP options) can be used to expose some QoS-related metadata for specific flows to 5GS. The draft focuses on the Extended Reality &amp; multi-modality communication (XRM) service.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="abstraction-and-control-of-traffic-engineered-networks-actn">
        <name>Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN)</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing"/> describes the applicability of ACTN to Network Slicing.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="mobility-aware-transport-network-slicing">
        <name>Mobility-Aware Transport Network Slicing</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility"/> discusses a mapping of 5G slices to RFC XXXX Network Slices when the transport network is separated from the networks in which the 5G network functions are deployed (e.g., 5G functions distributed across data centers). This document zooms into the use of UDP source port number in GTP-U outer header and LAN to map between a 5G slice and corresponding RFC XXXX Network Slice segments that is listed in <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-5g-network-slice-application"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="detnet">
        <name>DetNet</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.sw-detnet-network-slice-mapping-yang"/> describes the applicability of DetNet to RFC XXXX Network Slice, particularly to provide deterministic services. The document describes how to use DetNet flow aggregation as the Slice-Flow Aggregates over an underlying NRP following the approach in <xref target="flow-agg"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="orchestration-and-data-models">
      <name>Orchestration and Data Models</name>
      <t><xref target="model-overview"/> provides an example of the various data models that can be invoked in the context of Network Slicing.</t>
      <figure anchor="model-overview">
        <name>Overview of Data Models used for Network Slicing</name>
        <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
                              +---------------+
                               |   Customer    |
                               +-------+-------+
               Customer Service Model  |
               e.g., slice-svc, ac-svc,| and bearer-svc
                               +-------+-------+
                               |    Service    |
                               | Orchestration |
                               +-------+-------+
                Network Model          |
  e.g., l2vpn-ntw, l3vpn-ntw, sap, and | ac-ntw
                               +-------+-------+
                               |   Network     |
                               | Orchestration |
                               +-------+-------+
         Network Configuration Model   |
                           +-----------+-----------+
                           |                       |
                  +--------+------+       +--------+------+
                  |    Domain     |       |     Domain    |
                  | Orchestration |       | Orchestration |
                  +---+-----------+       +--------+------+
       Device         |        |                   |
       Configuration  |        |                   |
       Model          |        |                   |
                 +----+----+   |                   |
                 | Config  |   |                   |
                 | Manager |   |                   |
                 +----+----+   |                   |
                      |        |                   |
                      | NETCONF/CLI..................
                      |        |                   |
                    +--------------------------------+
      +----+ Bearer |                                | Bearer +----+
      |CE#1+--------+            Network             +--------+CE#2|
      +----+   AC   |                                |   AC   +----+
                    +--------------------------------+
       Site A                                                  Site B
]]></artwork>
      </figure>
      <section anchor="common-models">
        <name>Common Models</name>
        <t><xref target="RFC9181"/> specifies a set of reusable types and groupings to manage VPN services. Note that VPNs are used for the realization of Network Slices.</t>
        <t><xref target="I-D.boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac"/> specifies a set of reusable types and groupings to manage Attachment Circuits (ACs).</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="service-models">
        <name>Service Models</name>
        <section anchor="attachment-circuit-as-a-service-acaas-data-model">
          <name>Attachment Circuit as a Service (ACaaS) Data Model</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit"/> specifies YANG data models for managing 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) and also bearers. These ACs and bearers are used to identify where to deliver a slice service.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="network-slice-service-data-model">
          <name>Network Slice Service Data Model</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang"/> defines a YANG data model for manaing RFC XXXX Network Slice Services.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="network-models">
        <name>Network Models</name>
        <section anchor="sap">
          <name>Service Attachment Points (SAPs)</name>
          <t><xref target="RFC9408"/> defines a YANG data model for representing an abstract
   view of the provider network topology that contains the points from
   which its services can be attached (e.g., basic connectivity, VPN,
   network slices).  Also, the model can be used to retrieve the points
   where the services are actually being delivered to customers
   (including peer networks).</t>
          <t>A SAP network topology can be used for one or multiple service types ('service-type'). Setting this data node to 'network-slice' allows a controller to expose where RFC XXXX Network Slices services are being delivered. It can also be used to check where RFC XXXX Network Slice Services can be delivered.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="ac-augmented-saps">
          <name>AC-augmented SAPs</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit"/> augments the SAP model with more details for managing ACs at the network level.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="network-slice-topology">
          <name>Network Slice Topology</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang"/> specifies a YANG model for RFC XXXX Network Slice Topology with on exposing a customized topology that contains a topology intent with required SLO/SLEs to express the customer’s intent for resource reservation.</t>
          <t>The need for such a model is yet to be justified as the current scope is redundant with, e.g., what can be already achieved using <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang"/>. The authors should motivate why <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang"/> is not sufficient.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="network-resource-partitions-nrps">
          <name>Network Resource Partitions (NRPs)</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang"/> specifies a YANG data model for managing NRPs.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="network-slice-mapping">
          <name>Network Slice Mapping</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.dhody-teas-ietf-network-slice-mapping"/> specifies an RFC XXXX Network Slice Service mapping YANG model. The model supports the following mappings:</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>L3NM <xref target="RFC9182"/></li>
            <li>L2NM <xref target="RFC9291"/></li>
            <li>TE <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang"/></li>
            <li>NRP</li>
          </ul>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="cp-ext">
      <name>Control Plane Extensions</name>
      <section anchor="bgp-classful-transport-planes">
        <name>BGP Classful Transport Planes</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ct"/> specifies mechanisms for classifying underlay routes into a set of classes, called Transport Classes, and mapping service-specific routes to a specific Transport Class. For example, <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ct"/> can be used to create a customized topology for Network Slices. These topologies (Transport Classes) will be typically created to satisfy certain TE characteristics. A new Transport Class Route Target Extended Community is defined for this purpose. A Transport Class is identified by a 4-octet identifier: Transport Class ID.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="bgp-color-aware-routing-car">
        <name>BGP Color-Aware Routing (CAR)</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-car"/> specifies a new BGP SAFI called BGP Color-Aware Routing (BGP CAR). Colors are defined to characterize an objective (e.g., low latency). To satisfy Network Slice requirements, CAR may be used to establish paths that address specific objectives. These paths will be associated with a Color.</t>
        <t>The proposal leverages the BGP Color Extended Community defined in <xref target="RFC9012"/> and builds upon the Color concept defined in <xref target="RFC9256"/>. In addition, a new Extended Community, called Local-Color-Mapping (LCM) Extended Community, is defined to address cases where the granularity of the exposed colors differs when crossing domains.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="network-resource-partitions-nrps-1">
        <name>Network Resource Partitions (NRPs)</name>
        <section anchor="bgp-flowspec">
          <name>BGP Flowspec</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-flowspec-network-slice-ts"/> specifies a BGP Flowspec extension for NRP traffic steering.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="bgp-ls-filters-in-sr">
          <name>BGP-LS Filters in SR</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.drake-teas-bgp-ls-filter-nrp"/> specifies new BGP-LS attributes, called BGP-LS Filters, for NRPs in SR networks. A BGP-LS Filter provides a description of a subset of the links and nodes in an underlay network. Ingress PE selects a path to an egress PE from the topology defined by the BGP-LS Filters it has imported for a given VPN.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="sr-policies-extensions">
          <name>SR Policies Extensions</name>
          <section anchor="bgp">
            <name>BGP</name>
            <t><xref target="I-D.dong-idr-sr-policy-nrp"/> and <xref target="I-D.liu-idr-bgp-network-slicing"/> define extensions to BGP in order to advertise NRP ID in an SR Policy. The NRP ID is encoded in 4 octets.</t>
          </section>
          <section anchor="bgp-ls">
            <name>BGP-LS</name>
            <t><xref target="I-D.chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp"/> specifies SR Policy extensions for NRP in BGP-LS. The NRP ID is encoded in 4 octets.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
        <section anchor="pcep-extensions">
          <name>PCEP Extensions</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.dong-pce-pcep-nrp"/> specifie Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for NRP. The NRP ID is encoded in 4 octets.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="virtual-transport-networks-vtns">
        <name>Virtual Transport Networks (VTNs)</name>
        <section anchor="is-is-mt">
          <name>IS-IS MT</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt"/> specifies how to use IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for SR-based VTNs.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="bgp-ls-1">
          <name>BGP-LS</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt"/> describes a mechanism to distribute the information of SR-based VTNs to the  network controller using BGP-LS with Multi-Topology.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="dp-ext">
      <name>Data Plane Extensions</name>
      <section anchor="slice-identifier-in-the-mpls-entropy-label">
        <name>Slice Identifier in the MPLS Entropy Label</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id"/> proposes an approach to encode slice identifiers in a portion of the MPLS Entropy Label (EL). The number of bits to be used for encoding the slice identifier in the EL is policy-based. Transit LSRs uses the slice identifier in the EL to apply per-slice policies.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="slice-identifier-in-ipv6-flow-label">
        <name>Slice Identifier in IPv6 Flow Label</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.filsfils-spring-srv6-stateless-slice-id"/> proposes to encode slice identifers in a portion of the IPv6 Flow Label. Slice identifiers are used by intermediate IPv6 routers to process the packet according to
a network slice policy.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="slice-identifier-in-the-source-address-of-encapsulated-srh">
        <name>Slice Identifier in the Source Address of Encapsulated SRH</name>
        <t>When an ingress SR router encapsulates a packet in an IPv6 packet with an SRH, <xref target="I-D.cheng-spring-srv6-encoding-network-sliceid"/> suggests to use the least significant bits of the outer IPv6 source address to encode a slide identifier. SLID Presence Indicator (SPI) is used to indicate the presence of a slice identifier. The number of bits used to encode slice identifiers is local to an SR domain.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="vtn-resource-id-in-an-ipv6-extension-header">
        <name>VTN Resource ID in an IPv6 Extension Header</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id"/> describes a mechanism to carry an identifier, called VTN resource ID, in the IPv6 Hop-by-Hop extension header. The document claims that "VTN resource ID" is equivalent to NRP-ID, but does motivate why another yet ID is thus needed rather than using "NRP-ID".</t>
        <t>The length of the VTN ID depends on the context type. When CT=0, the VTN ID is a 4-octet ID.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="network-resource-partitions-nrps-2">
        <name>Network Resource Partitions (NRPs)</name>
        <section anchor="resource-aware-segments">
          <name>Resource-aware Segments</name>
          <t>An NRP can be represented in SR networks using a set of NRP-specific resource-aware segments <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments"/>
            <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn"/>.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="nrp-id-in-srv6">
          <name>NRP ID in SRv6</name>
          <t><xref target="I-D.liu-spring-nrp-id-in-srv6-segment"/> specifies an approach to encode the NRP ID in the SRH. This ID is used by intermediate IPv6 routers to identify the NRP to be used for forwarding. The encoding of the NRP ID in an IPv6 address is variable; an instruction is thus needed to help identifyint the NRP-ID position (e.g., low 16 bits).</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="nrp-selector-in-mpls-network-actions">
          <name>NRP Selector in MPLS Network Actions</name>
          <t>As mentioned in <xref target="flow-agg"/>, packets that are associated with a Slice-Flow Aggregate may carry an NRP Selector (NRPS). This selector is intended to be conveyed in the packet's network layer header to identify the flow aggregate to which a packet belongs. <xref target="I-D.li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector"/> investigates a set of options to use MPLS Network Actions (MNA) to carry the NRPS:</t>
          <ul spacing="normal">
            <li>13-bit NRP Selector (NRPS13) Action</li>
            <li>20-bit NRP Selector (NRPS20) Action</li>
            <li>20-bit Entropy and NRP Selector (ENRPS20) Action</li>
          </ul>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="oam">
      <name>OAM</name>
      <section anchor="lsp-pingtraceroute-extensions">
        <name>LSP Ping/Traceroute Extensions</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.liu-mpls-lsp-ping-nrp"/> specifies extenstions to the LSP Ping/Traceroute to convey NRP-ID in SR domains.</t>
        <t>The NRP-ID is a encoded as a 4-octet field.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="precision-availability-metrics-pam">
        <name>Precision Availability Metrics (PAM)</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-ippm-pam"/> introduces a new set of metrics, called Precision Availability Metrics (PAM). These metrics are used to assess whether a service (e.g., Network Slice Service) is provided in compliance with its specified SLOs.</t>
        <t><xref target="I-D.clemm-opsawg-pam-ipfix"/> specifies a set of new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements to export precision availability data associated with Flows. These Information Elements are specifically designed to indicate compliance of a Flow with an SLO.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ipfix-information-elements-for-nrp">
        <name>IPFIX Information Elements for NRP</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.liu-opsawg-ipfix-network-slice"/> explores how to use IPFIX to export NRP IDs. However, there is currently no one single stable/authoritative specification of NRP-ID. This identifier is being proposed as data plane and control plane extensions. These proposals do not share the same ID format.</t>
        <t>The initial version of <xref target="I-D.liu-opsawg-ipfix-network-slice"/> does explain which plan is used, in which layer the ID was exported, etc. Defining an IPFIX IE is useful for network observability, however there is no stable specification yet of the ID to be exported.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="misc">
      <name>Misc</name>
      <section anchor="scalability-considerations-for-nrp">
        <name>Scalability Considerations for NRP</name>
        <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability"/> discusses a set of scenarios for the deployment of NRP with a focus on scalability implications. The document reasons about the increase of requested RFC XXXX Network Slice Services that would require NRPs. Such an increase of slices is speculative at this stage.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>Security considerations of the mechanisms listed in the document are discussed in the relevant documents that specify these mechanisms.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="IANA">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document does not make any request to IANA.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>Informative References</name>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices">
        <front>
          <title>A Framework for Network Slices in Networks Built from IETF Technologies</title>
          <author fullname="Adrian Farrel" initials="A." surname="Farrel">
            <organization>Old Dog Consulting</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="John Drake" initials="J." surname="Drake">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shunsuke Homma" initials="S." surname="Homma">
            <organization>NTT</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Kiran Makhijani" initials="K." surname="Makhijani">
            <organization>Futurewei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura">
            <organization>Nvidia</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="14" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes network slicing in the context of networks
   built from IETF technologies.  It defines the term "IETF Network
   Slice" to describe this type of network slice, and establishes the
   general principles of network slicing in the IETF context.

   The document discusses the general framework for requesting and
   operating IETF Network Slices, the characteristics of an IETF Network
   Slice, the necessary system components and interfaces, and how
   abstract requests can be mapped to more specific technologies.  The
   document also discusses related considerations with monitoring and
   security.

   This document also provides definitions of related terms to enable
   consistent usage in other IETF documents that describe or use aspects
   of IETF Network Slices.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-25"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.srld-teas-5g-slicing">
        <front>
          <title>A Realization of IETF Network Slices for 5G Networks Using Current IP/ MPLS Technologies</title>
          <author fullname="Krzysztof Grzegorz Szarkowicz" initials="K. G." surname="Szarkowicz">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Richard Roberts" initials="R." surname="Roberts">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Julian Lucek" initials="J." surname="Lucek">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="23" month="May" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   5G slicing is a feature that was introduced by the 3rd Generation
   Partnership Project (3GPP) in mobile networks.  This feature covers
   slicing requirements for all mobile domains, including the Radio
   Access Network (RAN), Core Network (CN), and Transport Network (TN).

   This document describes a basic IETF Network Slice realization model
   in IP/MPLS networks with a focus on the Transport Network fulfilling
   5G slicing connectivity requirements.  This realization model reuses
   many building blocks currently commonly used in service provider
   networks.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-srld-teas-5g-slicing-09"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls">
        <front>
          <title>Realizing Network Slices in IP/MPLS Networks</title>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V. P." surname="Beeram">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bin Wen" initials="B." surname="Wen">
            <organization>Comcast</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Daniele Ceccarelli" initials="D." surname="Ceccarelli">
            <organization>Cisco Systems Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Joel M. Halpern" initials="J. M." surname="Halpern">
            <organization>Ericsson</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shaofu Peng" initials="S." surname="Peng">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ran Chen" initials="R." surname="Chen">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Xufeng Liu" initials="X." surname="Liu">
            <organization>IBM Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luay Jalil" initials="L." surname="Jalil">
            <organization>Verizon</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="13" month="March" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Realizing network slices may require the Service Provider to have the
   ability to partition a physical network into multiple logical
   networks of varying sizes, structures, and functions so that each
   slice can be dedicated to specific services or customers.  Multiple
   network slices can be realized on the same network while ensuring
   slice elasticity in terms of network resource allocation.  This
   document describes a scalable solution to realize network slicing in
   IP/MPLS networks by supporting multiple services on top of a single
   physical network by relying on compliant domains and nodes to provide
   forwarding treatment (scheduling, drop policy, resource usage) on to
   packets that carry identifiers that indicate the slicing service that
   is to be applied to the packets.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-ns-ip-mpls-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing">
        <front>
          <title>Framework and Data Model for OTN Network Slicing</title>
          <author fullname="Aihua Guo" initials="A." surname="Guo">
            <organization>Futurewei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Sergio Belotti" initials="S." surname="Belotti">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yunbin Xu" initials="Y." surname="Xu">
            <organization>CAICT</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yang Zhao" initials="Y." surname="Zhao">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Xufeng Liu" initials="X." surname="Liu">
            <organization>Alef Edge</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="7" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   The requirement of slicing network resources with desired quality of
   service is emerging at every network technology, including the
   Optical Transport Networks (OTN).  As a part of the transport
   network, OTN can provide hard pipes with guaranteed data isolation
   and deterministic low latency, which are highly demanded in the
   Service Level Agreement (SLA).

   This document describes a framework for OTN network slicing and
   defines YANG data models with OTN technology-specific augments
   deployed at both the north and south bound of the OTN network slice
   controller.  Additional YANG data model augmentations will be defined
   in a future version of this draft.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing-05"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn">
        <front>
          <title>A Framework for Enhanced Virtual Private Network (VPN+)</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Stewart Bryant" initials="S." surname="Bryant">
            <organization>University of Surrey</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenqiang Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Takuya Miyasaka" initials="T." surname="Miyasaka">
            <organization>KDDI Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Young Lee" initials="Y." surname="Lee">
            <organization>Samsung</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="28" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes the framework for Enhanced Virtual Private
   Network (VPN+) to support the needs of applications with specific
   traffic performance requirements (e.g., low latency, bounded jitter).
   VPN+ leverages the VPN and Traffic Engineering (TE) technologies and
   adds characteristics that specific services require beyond those
   provided by conventional VPNs.  Typically, VPN+ will be used to
   underpin network slicing, but could also be of use in its own right
   providing enhanced connectivity services between customer sites.
   This document also provides an overview of relevant technologies in
   different network layers, and identifies some areas for potential new
   work.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-14"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation">
        <front>
          <title>Instantiation of IETF Network Slice Services in Service Providers Networks</title>
          <author fullname="Samier Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Victor Lopez" initials="V." surname="Lopez">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Oscar Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O. G." surname="de Dios">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Daniel King" initials="D." surname="King">
            <organization>Old Dog Consulting</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document exemplifies how the various data modules that are
   produced in the IETF can be combined in the context of IETF Network
   Slice Services delivery.

   Specifically, this document describes the relationship between the
   IETF Network Slice Service models for requesting IETF Network Slice
   Services and both Service (e.g., the Layer-3 Service Model, the
   Layer-2 Service Model) and Network (e.g., the Layer-3 Network Model,
   the Layer-2 Network Model) models used during their realizations.  In
   addition, this document describes the communication between an IETF
   Network Slice Controller (NSC) and the network controllers for the
   realization of IETF Network Slices.

   The IETF Network Slice Service YANG model provides a customer-
   oriented view of the intended Network slice Service.  Thus, once an
   NSC receives a request for a Slice Service request, the NSC has to
   map it to accomplish the specific objectives expected by the network
   controllers.  Existing YANG network models are analyzed against the
   IETF Network Slice requirements, and the gaps in existing models are
   identified.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-barguil-teas-network-slices-instantation-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9182">
        <front>
          <title>A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNs</title>
          <author fullname="S. Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil"/>
          <author fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O." role="editor" surname="Gonzalez de Dios"/>
          <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Boucadair"/>
          <author fullname="L. Munoz" initials="L." surname="Munoz"/>
          <author fullname="A. Aguado" initials="A." surname="Aguado"/>
          <date month="February" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>As a complement to the Layer 3 Virtual Private Network Service Model (L3SM), which is used for communication between customers and service providers, this document defines an L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) that can be used for the provisioning of Layer 3 Virtual Private Network (L3VPN) services within a service provider network. The model provides a network-centric view of L3VPN services.</t>
            <t>The L3NM is meant to be used by a network controller to derive the configuration information that will be sent to relevant network devices. The model can also facilitate communication between a service orchestrator and a network controller/orchestrator.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9182"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9182"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9291">
        <front>
          <title>A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs</title>
          <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Boucadair"/>
          <author fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O." role="editor" surname="Gonzalez de Dios"/>
          <author fullname="S. Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil"/>
          <author fullname="L. Munoz" initials="L." surname="Munoz"/>
          <date month="September" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines an L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) that can be used to manage the provisioning of Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) services within a network (e.g., a service provider network). The L2NM complements the L2VPN Service Model (L2SM) by providing a network-centric view of the service that is internal to a service provider. The L2NM is particularly meant to be used by a network controller to derive the configuration information that will be sent to relevant network devices.</t>
            <t>Also, this document defines a YANG module to manage Ethernet segments and the initial versions of two IANA-maintained modules that include a set of identities of BGP Layer 2 encapsulation types and pseudowire types.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9291"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9291"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.contreras-teas-slice-controller-models">
        <front>
          <title>IETF Network Slice Controller and its associated data models</title>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura">
            <organization>Microsoft</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Xufeng Liu" initials="X." surname="Liu">
            <organization>IBM Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Sergio Belotti" initials="S." surname="Belotti">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="13" month="March" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes a potential division in major functional
   components of an IETF Network Slice Controller (NSC) as well as
   references the data models required for supporting the requests of
   IETF network slice services and their realization.

   This document describes a potential way of structuring the IETF
   Network Slice Controller as well as how to use different data models
   being defined for IETF Network Slice Service provision (and how they
   are related).  It is not the purpose of this document to standardize
   or constrain the implementation the IETF Network Slice Controller.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-contreras-teas-slice-controller-models-05"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.gong-teas-hierarchical-slice-solution">
        <front>
          <title>Segment Routing based Solution for Hierarchical IETF Network Slices</title>
          <author fullname="Liyan Gong" initials="L." surname="Gong">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Weiqiang Cheng" initials="W." surname="Cheng">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Changwang Lin" initials="C." surname="Lin">
            <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mengxiao Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen">
            <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ran Chen" initials="R." surname="Chen">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yanrong Liang" initials="Y." surname="Liang">
            <organization>Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd.</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="6" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes a Segment Routing based solution for two-
   level hierarchical IETF network slices. Level-1 network slice is
   realized by associating Flex-Algo with dedicated sub-interfaces, and
   level-2 network slice is realized by using SR Policy with additional
   NRP-ID on data plane.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-gong-teas-hierarchical-slice-solution-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.li-teas-composite-network-slices">
        <front>
          <title>Realization of Composite IETF Network Slices</title>
          <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ran Pang" initials="R." surname="Pang">
            <organization>China Unicom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yongqing Zhu" initials="Y." surname="Zhu">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Network slicing can be used to meet the connectivity and performance
   requirement of different applications or customers in a shared
   network.  An IETF network slice may be used for 5G or other network
   scenarios.  In the context of 5G, a 5G end-to-end network slice
   consists of three different types of network technology segments:
   Radio Access Network (RAN), Transport Network (TN) and Core Network
   (CN).  The transport segments of the 5G end-to-end network slice can
   be provided using IETF network slices.  In some scenarios, IETF
   network slices may span multiple network domains, and IETF network
   slices may be composed hierarchically, which means a network slice
   may itself be further sliced.

   This document first describes the possible use cases of composite
   IETF network slices, then it provides considerations about the
   realization of composite IETF network slices.  For the interaction
   between IETF network slices with 5G network slices, the identifiers
   of the 5G network slices may be introduced into IETF networks.  For
   the multi-domain IETF network slices, the Inter-Domain Network
   Resource Partition Identifier (Inter-domain NRP ID) is introduced.
   For the hierarchical IETF network slices, the structure of the NRP ID
   is discussed.  These network slice-related identifiers may be used in
   the data plane, control plane and management plane of the network for
   the instantiation and management of composite IETF network slices.
   This document also describes the management considerations of
   composite network slices.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-li-teas-composite-network-slices-01"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-5g-network-slice-application">
        <front>
          <title>IETF Network Slice Application in 3GPP 5G End-to-End Network Slice</title>
          <author fullname="Xuesong Geng" initials="X." surname="Geng">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ivan Bykov" initials="I." surname="Bykov">
            <organization>Ribbon Communications</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Network Slicing is one of the core features of 5G defined in 3GPP,
   which provides different network service as independent logical
   networks.  To provide 5G network slices services, an end-to-end
   network slices have to span three network segments: Radio Access
   Network (RAN), Mobile Core Network (CN) and Transport Network (TN).
   This document describes the application of the IETF network slice
   framework in providing 5G end-to-end network slices, including
   network slice mapping in management plane, control plane and data
   plane.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-5g-network-slice-application-01"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.jiang-tsvwg-slice-media-service">
        <front>
          <title>Encoding 3GPP Slices for Interactive Media Services</title>
          <author fullname="Tianji Jiang" initials="T." surname="Jiang">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dan Wang" initials="D." surname="Wang">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="23" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Extended Reality &amp; multi-modality communication, or XRM, is a type of
   advanced service that has been studied and standardized in the 3GPP
   SA2 working group.  It targets at achieving high data rate, ultra-low
   latency, and high reliability.  The streams of an XRM service might
   be comprised of data from multiple modalities, namely, video, audio,
   ambient-sensor and haptic detection, etc.  XRM service faces
   challenges on various aspects, e.g. accurate multi-modality data
   synchronization, QoS differentiation, large volume of packets, and
   etc.  While a new 3GPP network slice type, HDLLC, has been recently
   introduced to handle the QoS requirements of XRM streams, the
   ubiquitously-existed encryption of packet payload posts additional
   challenges to the transport of encoded video packets via 5GS.  We
   have then discussed two potential IETF schemes, e.g., IP-DSCP based
   or UDP-option extension, that could be applied to 'expose' XRM QoS
   'metadata' to 5GS.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-jiang-tsvwg-slice-media-service-00"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing">
        <front>
          <title>Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) to Network Slicing</title>
          <author fullname="Daniel King" initials="D." surname="King">
            <organization>Old Dog Consulting</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="John Drake" initials="J." surname="Drake">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Haomian Zheng" initials="H." surname="Zheng">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Adrian Farrel" initials="A." surname="Farrel">
            <organization>Old Dog Consulting</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="29" month="August" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Network abstraction is a technique that can be applied to a network
   domain to obtain a view of potential connectivity across the network
   by utilizing a set of policies to select network resources.

   Network slicing is an approach to network operations that builds on
   the concept of network abstraction to provide programmability,
   flexibility, and modularity.  It may use techniques such as Software
   Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) to
   create multiple logical or virtual networks, each tailored for a set
   of services that share the same set of requirements.

   Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) is
   described in RFC 8453.  It defines an SDN-based architecture that
   relies on the concept of network and service abstraction to detach
   network and service control from the underlying data plane.

   This document outlines the applicability of ACTN to network slicing
   in a Traffic Engineered (TE) network that utilizes IETF technologies.
   It also identifies the features of network slicing not currently
   within the scope of ACTN, and indicates where ACTN might be extended.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-04"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility">
        <front>
          <title>Mobility aware Transport Network Slicing for 5G</title>
          <author fullname="Uma Chunduri" initials="U." surname="Chunduri">
            <organization>Intel Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="John Kaippallimalil" initials="J." surname="Kaippallimalil">
            <organization>Futurewei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Sridhar Bhaskaran" initials="S." surname="Bhaskaran">
            <organization>Rakuten Symphony</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura">
            <organization>Microsoft</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Praveen Muley" initials="P." surname="Muley">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="5" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Network slicing in 5G supports logical networks for communication
   services of multiple 5G customers to be multiplexed over the same
   infrastructure.  While 5G slicing covers logical separation of
   various aspects of 5G services, user's data plane packets over the
   radio access network (RAN) and mobile core network (5GC) use IP
   transport in many segments of the end-to-end 5G slice.  When end-to-
   end slices in a 5G system use IP network resources, they are mapped
   to corresponding IP transport network slice(s) which in turn provide
   the bandwidth, latency, isolation and other criteria requested by the
   5G slice.

   This document describes mapping of 5G slices to IP or Layer 2
   transport network slices when the IP transport network (slice
   provider) is separated from the networks in which the 5G network
   functions are deployed, for example, 5G functions that are
   distributed across data centers.  The slice mapping proposed here is
   supported transparently when a 5G user device moves across 5G
   attachment points and session anchors.


            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.sw-detnet-network-slice-mapping-yang">
        <front>
          <title>YANG Data Model for DetNet Mapping with Network Slice</title>
          <author fullname="Xueyan Song" initials="X." surname="Song">
            <organization>ZTE Corp.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Haisheng Wu" initials="H." surname="Wu">
            <organization>ZTE Corp.</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="8" month="March" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   The convergence of IETF Network Slicing with DetNet achieves adequate
   network resource allocation and reservation to each node along the
   way of DetNet flows for latency-sensitive services.  This document
   introduces the applicability of DetNet to network slice , DetNet
   mapping with Network Slice requirements and YANG data models
   extensions in the context of IP/ MPLS network.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-sw-detnet-network-slice-mapping-yang-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9181">
        <front>
          <title>A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs</title>
          <author fullname="S. Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil"/>
          <author fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O." role="editor" surname="Gonzalez de Dios"/>
          <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Boucadair"/>
          <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu"/>
          <date month="February" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines a common YANG module that is meant to be reused by various VPN-related modules such as Layer 3 VPN and Layer 2 VPN network models.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9181"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9181"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac">
        <front>
          <title>A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits</title>
          <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Richard Roberts" initials="R." surname="Roberts">
            <organization>Juniper</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Oscar Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O. G." surname="de Dios">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Samier Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="3" month="May" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   The document specifies a common Attachment Circuits (ACs) YANG
   module, which is designed with the intent to be reusable by other
   models.  For example, this common model can be reused by service
   models to expose ACs as a service, service models that require
   binding a service to a set of ACs, network and device models to
   provision ACs, etc.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit">
        <front>
          <title>YANG Data Models for 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS)</title>
          <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Richard Roberts" initials="R." surname="Roberts">
            <organization>Juniper</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Oscar Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O. G." surname="de Dios">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Samier Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document specifies a YANG service data model for Attachment
   Circuits (ACs).  This model can be used for the provisioning of ACs
   before or during service provisioning (e.g., Network Slice Service).
   The document also specifies a module that updates other service and
   network modules with the required information to bind specific
   services to ACs that are created using the AC service model.

   Also, the document specifies a set of reusable groupings.  Whether
   other service models reuse structures defined in the AC models or
   simply include an AC reference is a design choice of these service
   models.  Utilizing the AC service model to manage ACs over which a
   service is delivered has the advantage of decoupling service
   management from upgrading AC components to incorporate recent AC
   technologies or features.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang">
        <front>
          <title>A YANG Data Model for the IETF Network Slice Service</title>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Liuyan Han" initials="L." surname="Han">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="John Mullooly" initials="J." surname="Mullooly">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document defines a YANG data model for the IETF Network Slice
   Service.  The model can be used in the IETF Network Slice Service
   interface between a customer and a provider that offers IETF Network
   Slices.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-06"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9408">
        <front>
          <title>A YANG Network Data Model for Service Attachment Points (SAPs)</title>
          <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Boucadair"/>
          <author fullname="O. Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O." surname="Gonzalez de Dios"/>
          <author fullname="S. Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil"/>
          <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu"/>
          <author fullname="V. Lopez" initials="V." surname="Lopez"/>
          <date month="June" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines a YANG data model for representing an abstract view of the provider network topology that contains the points from which its services can be attached (e.g., basic connectivity, VPN, network slices). Also, the model can be used to retrieve the points where the services are actually being delivered to customers (including peer networks).</t>
            <t>This document augments the 'ietf-network' data model defined in RFC 8345 by adding the concept of Service Attachment Points (SAPs). The SAPs are the network reference points to which network services, such as Layer 3 Virtual Private Network (L3VPN) or Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN), can be attached. One or multiple services can be bound to the same SAP. Both User-to-Network Interface (UNI) and Network-to-Network Interface (NNI) are supported in the SAP data model.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9408"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9408"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit">
        <front>
          <title>A Network YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits</title>
          <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Richard Roberts" initials="R." surname="Roberts">
            <organization>Juniper</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Oscar Gonzalez de Dios" initials="O. G." surname="de Dios">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Samier Barguil" initials="S." surname="Barguil">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="5" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document specifies a network model for attachment circuits.  The
   model can be used for the provisioning of attachment circuits prior
   or during service provisioning (e.g., Network Slice Service).  A
   companion service model is specified in
   [I-D.boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit].

   The module augments the Service Attachment Point (SAP) model with the
   detailed information for the provisioning of attachment circuits in
   Provider Edges (PEs).

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-03"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang">
        <front>
          <title>IETF Network Slice Topology YANG Data Model</title>
          <author fullname="Xufeng Liu" initials="X." surname="Liu">
            <organization>Alef Edge</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura">
            <organization>Microsoft</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Igor Bryskin" initials="I." surname="Bryskin">
            <organization>Individual</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luis M. Contreras" initials="L. M." surname="Contreras">
            <organization>Telefonica</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Qin Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Sergio Belotti" initials="S." surname="Belotti">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Aihua Guo" initials="A." surname="Guo">
            <organization>Futurewei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Italo Busi" initials="I." surname="Busi">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="7" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   An IETF network slice may use a customized topology to describe
   intended resource reservation for connectivities between slice
   endpoints.  Customized topologies enable customers to request shared
   resources among connections activated on demand and to customize the
   service paths in a network slice with an extensive level of control.

   This document describes a YANG data model for managing and
   controlling customized topologies for IETF network slices defined in
   RFC YYYY.

   [RFC EDITOR NOTE: Please replace RFC YYYY with the RFC number of
   draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices once it has been published.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang">
        <front>
          <title>A YANG Data Model for Virtual Network (VN) Operations</title>
          <author fullname="Young Lee" initials="Y." surname="Lee">
            <organization>Samsung Electronics</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Daniele Ceccarelli" initials="D." surname="Ceccarelli">
            <organization>Cisco</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Igor Bryskin" initials="I." surname="Bryskin">
            <organization>Individual</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bin Yeong Yoon" initials="B. Y." surname="Yoon">
            <organization>ETRI</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="12" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   A Virtual Network (VN) is a network provided by a service provider to
   a customer for the customer to use in any way it wants.  This
   document provides a YANG data model generally applicable to any mode
   of VN operations.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-19"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang">
        <front>
          <title>A YANG Data Model for Network Resource Partitions (NRPs)</title>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V. P." surname="Beeram">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shaofu Peng" initials="S." surname="Peng">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="28" month="August" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   A Network Resource Partition (NRP) is a collection of resources
   identified in the underlay network to support services (like IETF
   Network Slices) that need logical network structures with required
   Service Level Objective (SLO) and Service Level Expectation (SLE)
   characteristics to be created.  This document defines a YANG data
   model for Network Resource Partitions (NRPs).  The model can be used,
   in particular, for the realization of the IETF Network Slice Services
   in IP/MPLS networks.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.dhody-teas-ietf-network-slice-mapping">
        <front>
          <title>IETF Network Slice Service Mapping YANG Model</title>
          <author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Bo Wu" initials="B." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="12" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document provides a YANG data model to map IETF network slice
   service to Traffic Engineering (TE) models (e.g., the Virtual Network
   (VN) model or the TE Tunnel etc).  It also supports mapping to the
   VPN Network models and Network Resource Partition (NRP) models.
   These models are referred to as IETF network slice service mapping
   model and are applicable generically for the seamless control and
   management of the IETF network slice service with underlying TE/VPN
   support.

   The models are principally used for monitoring and diagnostics of the
   management systems to show how the IETF network slice service
   requests are mapped onto underlying network resource and TE/VPN
   models.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-dhody-teas-ietf-network-slice-mapping-04"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang">
        <front>
          <title>Traffic Engineering (TE) and Service Mapping YANG Data Model</title>
          <author fullname="Young Lee" initials="Y." surname="Lee">
            <organization>Samsung Electronics</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Dhruv Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
            <organization>Huawei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Giuseppe Fioccola" initials="G." surname="Fioccola">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Qin Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Daniele Ceccarelli" initials="D." surname="Ceccarelli">
            <organization>Cisco</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura">
            <organization>Nvidia</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="12" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document provides a YANG data model to map customer service
   models (e.g., L3VPN Service Delivery model) to Traffic Engineering
   (TE) models (e.g., the TE Tunnel or the Virtual Network (VN) model).
   These models are referred to as TE Service Mapping Model and are
   applicable generically to the operator's need for seamless control
   and management of their VPN services with underlying TE support.

   The models are principally used for monitoring and diagnostics of the
   management systems to show how the service requests are mapped onto
   underlying network resource and TE models.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-14"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ct">
        <front>
          <title>BGP Classful Transport Planes</title>
          <author fullname="Kaliraj Vairavakkalai" initials="K." surname="Vairavakkalai">
            <organization>Juniper Networks, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Natrajan Venkataraman" initials="N." surname="Venkataraman">
            <organization>Juniper Networks, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="21" month="August" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document specifies a mechanism, referred to as "Intent Driven
   Service Mapping", that uses BGP to express intent based association
   of overlay routes, with underlay routes having specific Traffic
   Engineering (TE) characteristics, that satisfy a certain Service
   Level Agreement (SLA).  The document achieves this by defining new
   constructs, to group underlay routes with sufficiently similar TE
   characteristics into identifiable classes (called, Transport
   Classes), that overlay routes use as an ordered set to resolve
   reachability (Resolution Schemes) towards service endpoints.  These
   constructs can be used, e.g., to realize the "IETF Network Slice"
   defined in TEAS Network Slices framework.

   This document specifies protocol procedures for BGP that enable
   dissemination of service mapping information in a network that may
   span multiple cooperating administrative domains.  These domains may
   be administered either by the same provider or by closely
   coordinating providers.  A new BGP address family that leverages RFC
   4364 procedures and follows RFC 8277 NLRI encoding, is defined to
   advertise underlay routes with its identified class.  This new
   address family is called "BGP Classful Transport", a.k.a., BGP CT.


            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct-14"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-car">
        <front>
          <title>BGP Color-Aware Routing (CAR)</title>
          <author fullname="Dhananjaya Rao" initials="D." surname="Rao">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Swadesh Agrawal" initials="S." surname="Agrawal">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Co-authors" initials="" surname="Co-authors">
         </author>
          <date day="6" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes a BGP based routing solution to establish
   end-to-end intent-aware paths across a multi-domain service provider
   transport network.  This solution is called BGP Color-Aware Routing
   (BGP CAR).

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-car-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9012">
        <front>
          <title>The BGP Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute</title>
          <author fullname="K. Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel"/>
          <author fullname="G. Van de Velde" initials="G." surname="Van de Velde"/>
          <author fullname="S. Sangli" initials="S." surname="Sangli"/>
          <author fullname="J. Scudder" initials="J." surname="Scudder"/>
          <date month="April" year="2021"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>This document defines a BGP path attribute known as the "Tunnel Encapsulation attribute", which can be used with BGP UPDATEs of various Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (SAFIs) to provide information needed to create tunnels and their corresponding encapsulation headers. It provides encodings for a number of tunnel types, along with procedures for choosing between alternate tunnels and routing packets into tunnels.</t>
            <t>This document obsoletes RFC 5512, which provided an earlier definition of the Tunnel Encapsulation attribute. RFC 5512 was never deployed in production. Since RFC 5566 relies on RFC 5512, it is likewise obsoleted. This document updates RFC 5640 by indicating that the Load-Balancing Block sub-TLV may be included in any Tunnel Encapsulation attribute where load balancing is desired.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9012"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9012"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC9256">
        <front>
          <title>Segment Routing Policy Architecture</title>
          <author fullname="C. Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils"/>
          <author fullname="K. Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor" surname="Talaulikar"/>
          <author fullname="D. Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer"/>
          <author fullname="A. Bogdanov" initials="A." surname="Bogdanov"/>
          <author fullname="P. Mattes" initials="P." surname="Mattes"/>
          <date month="July" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any path. Intermediate per-path states are eliminated thanks to source routing. SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions) that represent a source-routed policy. Packet flows are steered into an SR Policy on a node where it is instantiated called a headend node. The packets steered into an SR Policy carry an ordered list of segments associated with that SR Policy.</t>
            <t>This document updates RFC 8402 as it details the concepts of SR Policy and steering into an SR Policy.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9256"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9256"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-idr-flowspec-network-slice-ts">
        <front>
          <title>BGP Flowspec for IETF Network Slice Traffic Steering</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ran Chen" initials="R." surname="Chen">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Subin Wang" initials="S." surname="Wang">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jiang Wenying" initials="J." surname="Wenying">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   BGP Flow Specification (Flowspec) provides a mechanism to distribute
   traffic flow specifications and the forwarding actions to be
   performed to the specific traffic flows.  A set of Flowspec
   components are defined to specify the matching criteria that can be
   applied to the packet, and a set of BGP extended communities are
   defined to encode the actions a routing system can take on a packet
   which matches the flow specification.

   An IETF Network Slice enables connectivity between a set of Service
   Demarcation Points (SDPs) with specific Service Level Objectives
   (SLOs) and Service Level Expectations (SLEs) over a common underlay
   network.  To meet the connectivity and performance requirements of
   network slice services, network slice service traffic may need to be
   mapped to a corresponding Network Resource Partition (NRP).  The edge
   nodes of the NRP needs to identify the traffic flows of specific
   connectivity constructs of network slices, and steer the matched
   traffic into the corresponding NRP, or a specific path within the
   corresponding NRP.

   BGP Flowspec can be used to distribute the matching criteria and the
   forwarding actions to be preformed on network slice service traffic.
   The existing Flowspec components can be reused for the matching of
   network slice services flows at the edge of an NRP.  New components
   and traffic action may need to be defined for steering network slice
   service flows into the corresponding NRP.  This document defines the
   extensions to BGP Flowspec for IETF network slice traffic steering
   (NS-TS).

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-network-slice-ts-01"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.drake-teas-bgp-ls-filter-nrp">
        <front>
          <title>Using BGP-LS Filters to Instanted Network Resource Partitions</title>
          <author fullname="John Drake" initials="J." surname="Drake">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Adrian Farrel" initials="A." surname="Farrel">
            <organization>Old Dog Consulting</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luay Jalil" initials="L." surname="Jalil">
            <organization>Verizon</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Avinash Reddy Lingala" initials="A. R." surname="Lingala">
            <organization>AT&amp;T</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="16" month="December" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Future networks that support advanced services, such as those enabled
   by 5G mobile networks, envision a set of overlay networks each with
   different performance and scaling properties.  These overlays are
   known as network slices and are realized over a common underlay
   network.  In the context of IETF technologies, they are known as IETF
   network slices.

   In order to support IETF network slicing, as well as to offer
   enhanced VPN services in general, it is necessary to define a
   mechanism by which specific resources (buffers, queues, scheduling
   policies, etc.) of specific network topology components (links and/or
   nodes) of an underlay network can be used by a specific network
   slice, VPN, or set of VPNs.  These collections of resources are known
   as Network Resource Partitions (NRPs).

   This document sets out such a mechanism for use of BGP-LS to
   construct and operate NRPs in Segment Routing networks.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-drake-teas-bgp-ls-filter-nrp-00"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.dong-idr-sr-policy-nrp">
        <front>
          <title>BGP SR Policy Extensions for Network Resource Partition</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhibo Hu" initials="Z." surname="Hu">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Ran Pang" initials="R." surname="Pang">
            <organization>China Unicom</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="5" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Segment Routing (SR) Policy is a set of candidate paths, each
   consisting of one or more segment lists and the associated
   information.  The header of a packet steered in an SR Policy is
   augmented with an ordered list of segments associated with that SR
   Policy.  A Network Resource Partition (NRP) is a subset of network
   resources allocated in the underlay network which can be used to
   support one or a group of IETF network slice services.

   In networks where there are multiple NRPs, an SR Policy may be
   associated with a particular NRP.  The association between SR Policy
   and NRP needs to be specified, so that for service traffic which is
   steered into the SR Policy, the header of the packets can be
   augmented with the information associated with the NRP.  An SR Policy
   candidate path can be distributed using BGP SR Policy.  This document
   defines the extensions to BGP SR policy to specify the NRP which the
   SR Policy candidate path is associated with.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-dong-idr-sr-policy-nrp-03"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.liu-idr-bgp-network-slicing">
        <front>
          <title>BGP Extensions to Support Packet Network Slicing in SR Policy</title>
          <author fullname="Yao Liu" initials="Y." surname="Liu">
            <organization>ZTE</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shaofu Peng" initials="S." surname="Peng">
            <organization>ZTE</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="31" month="March" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document defines extensions to BGP in order to advertise Network
   Resource Partition (NRP) in SR policy.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-liu-idr-bgp-network-slicing-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp">
        <front>
          <title>SR Policies Extensions for NRP in BGP-LS</title>
          <author fullname="Ran Chen" initials="R." surname="Chen">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Detao Zhao" initials="D." surname="Zhao">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Liyan Gong" initials="L." surname="Gong">
            <organization>China mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yongqing Zhu" initials="Y." surname="Zhu">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="15" month="April" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document defines a new TLV which enable the headed to report the
   configuration and the states of SR policies carrying NRP information
   by using BGP-LS.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.dong-pce-pcep-nrp">
        <front>
          <title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Network Resource Partition (NRP)</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Sheng Fang" initials="S." surname="Fang">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Quan Xiong" initials="Q." surname="Xiong">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shaofu Peng" initials="S." surname="Peng">
            <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Liuyan Han" initials="L." surname="Han">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Minxue Wang" initials="M." surname="Wang">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V. P." surname="Beeram">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="March" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document specifies the extensions to Path Computation Element
   Communication Protocol (PCEP) to carry Network Resource Partition
   (NRP) related information in the PCEP messages.  The extensions in
   this document can be used to indicate the NRP-specific constraints
   and information needed in path computation, path status report and
   path initialization.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp-00"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt">
        <front>
          <title>Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network</title>
          <author fullname="Chongfeng Xie" initials="C." surname="Xie">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Chenhao Ma" initials="C." surname="Ma">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Enhanced VPN (VPN+) aims to provide enhanced VPN service to support
   some existing and emerging application's needs of enhanced isolation
   and stringent performance requirements.  VPN+ requires integration
   between the overlay VPN connectivity and the characteristics provided
   by the underlay network.  A Virtual Transport Network (VTN) is a
   virtual underlay network that is associated with a network topology,
   and is allocated with a set of dedicated or shared resources from the
   underlay physical network.  A VTN could be used as the underlay to
   support one or a group of VPN+ services.

   In some network scenarios, each VTN can be associated with a unique
   logical network topology.  This document describes a mechanism to
   build the SR based VTNs using IS-IS Multi-Topology together with
   other well-defined IS-IS extensions.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-05"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt">
        <front>
          <title>BGP-LS with Multi-topology for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Networks</title>
          <author fullname="Chongfeng Xie" initials="C." surname="Xie">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Cong Li" initials="C." surname="Li">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="September" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Enhanced VPN (VPN+) aims to provide enhanced VPN service to support
   some applications' needs of enhanced isolation and stringent
   performance requirements.  VPN+ requires integration between the
   overlay VPN and the underlay network.  A Virtual Transport Network
   (VTN) is a virtual underlay network which consists of a subset of the
   network topology and network resources allocated from the physical
   network.  A VTN could be used as the underlay for one or a group of
   VPN+ services.

   When Segment Routing is used as the data plane of VTNs, each VTN can
   be allocated with a group of Segment Identifiers (SIDs) to identify
   the topology and resource attributes of network segments in the VTN.
   The association between the network topology, the network resource
   attributes and the SR SIDs may need to be distributed to a
   centralized network controller.  In network scenarios where each VTN
   can be associated with a unique logical network topology, this
   document describes a mechanism to distribute the information of SR
   based VTNs using BGP-LS with Multi-Topology.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-03"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id">
        <front>
          <title>Using Entropy Label for Network Slice Identification in MPLS networks.</title>
          <author fullname="Bruno Decraene" initials="B." surname="Decraene">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Clarence Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Wim Henderickx" initials="W." surname="Henderickx">
            <organization>Nokia</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V. P." surname="Beeram">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Luay Jalil" initials="L." surname="Jalil">
            <organization>Verizon</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="12" month="December" year="2022"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document updates [RFC6790] to extend the use of the TTL field of
   the Entropy Label in order to provide a flexible set of flags called
   the Entropy Label Control field.

   This document also defines a solution to encode a slice identifier in
   MPLS in order to distinguish packets that belong to different slices,
   to allow enforcing per network slice policies (.e.g, Qos).

   The slice identification is independent of the topology.  It allows
   for QoS/DiffServ policy on a per slice basis in addition to the per
   packet QoS/DiffServ policy provided by the MPLS Traffic Class field.

   In order to minimize the size of the MPLS stack and to ease
   incremental deployment the slice identifier is encoded as part of the
   Entropy Label.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-05"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.filsfils-spring-srv6-stateless-slice-id">
        <front>
          <title>Stateless and Scalable Network Slice Identification for SRv6</title>
          <author fullname="Clarence Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Francois Clad" initials="F." surname="Clad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Pablo Camarillo" initials="P." surname="Camarillo">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Syed Raza" initials="S." surname="Raza">
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Daniel Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer">
            <organization>Bell Canada</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Reza Rokui" initials="R." surname="Rokui">
            <organization>Ciena</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="1" month="August" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document defines a stateless and scalable solution to achieve
   network slicing with SRv6.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-stateless-slice-id-08"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.cheng-spring-srv6-encoding-network-sliceid">
        <front>
          <title>Encoding Network Slice Identification for SRv6</title>
          <author fullname="Weiqiang Cheng" initials="W." surname="Cheng">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Peiyong Ma" initials="P." surname="Ma">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Fenghua Ren" initials="F." surname="Ren">
            <organization>China Unicom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Changwang Lin" initials="C." surname="Lin">
            <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Liyan Gong" initials="L." surname="Gong">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shay Zadok" initials="S." surname="Zadok">
            <organization>Broadcom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mingyu Wu" initials="M." surname="Wu">
            <organization>CentecNetworks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="xuewei wang" initials="X." surname="wang">
            <organization>Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd.</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="10" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes a method to encode network slicing
   identifier within SRv6 domain.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-cheng-spring-srv6-encoding-network-sliceid-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id">
        <front>
          <title>Carrying Virtual Transport Network (VTN) Information in IPv6 Extension Header</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Chongfeng Xie" initials="C." surname="Xie">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Chenhao Ma" initials="C." surname="Ma">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Gyan Mishra" initials="G. S." surname="Mishra">
            <organization>Verizon Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="6" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) provide different customers with
   logically separated connectivity over a common network
   infrastructure.  With the introduction and evolvement of 5G and also
   in some existing network scenarios, some customers may require
   network connectivity services with advanced features comparing to
   conventional VPN services.  Such kind of network service is called
   enhanced VPNs (VPN+).  VPN+ can be used, for example, to deliver IETF
   network slice services.

   A VTN is a virtual underlay network that is associated with a network
   topology, and is allocated with a set of dedicated or shared
   resources from the underlay physical network.  VPN+ services can be
   delivered by mapping one or a group of overlay VPNs to the
   appropriate VTNs as the virtual underlay.  For packet forwarding in a
   specific VTN, some fields in the data packet are used to identify the
   VTN the packet belongs to, so that VTN-specific processing can be
   performed on each node along a VTN-specific path.

   This document specifies a new IPv6 Hop-by-Hop option to carry the VTN
   related information in data packets, which could be used to identify
   the VTN-specific processing to be performed on the packets by each
   network node along a VTN-specific path.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-vpn-vtn-id-05"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments">
        <front>
          <title>Introducing Resource Awareness to SR Segments</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Stewart Bryant" initials="S." surname="Bryant">
            <organization>University of Surrey</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Takuya Miyasaka" initials="T." surname="Miyasaka">
            <organization>KDDI Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yongqing Zhu" initials="Y." surname="Zhu">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Fengwei Qin" initials="F." surname="Qin">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenqiang Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Francois Clad" initials="F." surname="Clad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="31" month="May" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document describes the mechanism to associate network resources
   to Segment Routing Identifiers (SIDs).  Such SIDs are referred to as
   resource-aware SIDs in this document.  The resource-aware SIDs retain
   their original forwarding semantics, but with the additional
   semantics to identify the set of network resources available for the
   packet processing and forwarding action.  The resource-aware SIDs can
   therefore be used to build SR paths or virtual networks with a set of
   reserved network resources.  The proposed mechanism is applicable to
   both segment routing with MPLS data plane (SR-MPLS) and segment
   routing with IPv6 data plane (SRv6).

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-07"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn">
        <front>
          <title>Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network (VTN) for Enhanced VPN</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Stewart Bryant" initials="S." surname="Bryant">
            <organization>University of Surrey</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Takuya Miyasaka" initials="T." surname="Miyasaka">
            <organization>KDDI Corporation</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Yongqing Zhu" initials="Y." surname="Zhu">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Fengwei Qin" initials="F." surname="Qin">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenqiang Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Francois Clad" initials="F." surname="Clad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="31" month="May" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm.  A node
   steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called
   "segments".  A segment can represent topological or service based
   instructions.  A segment can further be associated with a set of
   network resources used for executing the instruction.  Such a segment
   is called resource-aware segment.

   A Virtual Transport Network (VTN) is a virtual underlay network which
   is associated with a network topology, and is allocated with a set of
   dedicated or shared resources from the underlay physical network.

   Resource-aware Segment Identifiers (SIDs) may be used to build SR
   paths with a set of reserved network resources.  In addition, a group
   of resource-aware SIDs may be used to build SR based virtual underlay
   networks, which provide customized network topology and resource
   attributes required by one or a group of customers and/or services.
   Such virtual underlay networks are the SR instantiations of VTNs.

   This document describes a suggested approach to build SR based VTNs
   using resource-aware SIDs.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn-05"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.liu-spring-nrp-id-in-srv6-segment">
        <front>
          <title>NRP ID in SRv6 segment</title>
          <author fullname="Yisong Liu" initials="Y." surname="Liu">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Changwang Lin" initials="C." surname="Lin">
            <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Hao Li" initials="H." surname="Li">
            <organization>New H3C Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Liyan Gong" initials="L." surname="Gong">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="17" month="April" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document proposes a method to carry the NRP-ID with the packet
   in the SRv6 segment.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-liu-spring-nrp-id-in-srv6-segment-02"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector">
        <front>
          <title>MPLS Network Actions for Network Resource Partition Selector</title>
          <author fullname="Tony Li" initials="T." surname="Li">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="John Drake" initials="J." surname="Drake">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V. P." surname="Beeram">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Israel Meilik" initials="I." surname="Meilik">
            <organization>Broadcom</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="5" month="May" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   An IETF Network Slice service provides connectivity coupled with a
   set of network resource commitments and is expressed in terms of one
   or more connectivity constructs.  A Network Resource Partition (NRP)
   is a collection of resources identified in the underlay network to
   support IETF Network Slice services.  A Slice-Flow Aggregate refers
   to the set of traffic streams from one or more connectivity
   constructs belonging to one or more IETF Network Slices that are
   mapped to a specific NRP and provided the same forwarding treatment.
   The packets associated with a Slice-Flow Aggregate may carry a
   marking in the packet's network layer header to identify this
   association and this marking is referred to as NRP Selector.  The NRP
   Selector is used to map the packet to the associated NRP and provide
   the corresponding forwarding treatment to the packet.

   MPLS Network Actions (MNA) technologies are used to indicate actions
   for Label Switched Paths (LSPs) and/or MPLS packets and to transfer
   data needed for these actions.  This document discusses options for
   using MPLS Network Actions (MNAs) to carry the NRP Selector in MPLS
   packets.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-00"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.liu-mpls-lsp-ping-nrp">
        <front>
          <title>LSP Ping/Traceroute for SR-MPLS NRP SIDs</title>
          <author fullname="Yao Liu" initials="Y." surname="Liu">
            <organization>ZTE</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Shaofu Peng" initials="S." surname="Peng">
            <organization>ZTE</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="12" month="March" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   [RFC8287] defines the extensions to MPLS LSP ping and traceroute for
   Segment Routing IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency SIDs with an MPLS data
   plane.  To correctly identify and validate an SR NRP SID, the
   validating device also requires NRP-ID to be supplied in the FEC
   Stack sub-TLV.  This document introduces new Target FEC Stack sub-
   TLVs to perform MPLS LSP ping and traceroute for NRP SIDs.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-liu-mpls-lsp-ping-nrp-01"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-ippm-pam">
        <front>
          <title>Precision Availability Metrics for Services Governed by Service Level Objectives (SLOs)</title>
          <author fullname="Greg Mirsky" initials="G." surname="Mirsky">
            <organization>Ericsson</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Joel M. Halpern" initials="J. M." surname="Halpern">
            <organization>Ericsson</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Xiao Min" initials="X." surname="Min">
            <organization>ZTE Corp.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Alexander Clemm" initials="A." surname="Clemm">
            <organization>Futurewei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="John Strassner" initials="J." surname="Strassner">
            <organization>Futurewei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jérôme François" initials="J." surname="François">
            <organization>Inria and University of Luxembourg</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="22" month="August" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document defines a set of metrics for networking services with
   performance requirements expressed as Service Level Objectives (SLO).
   These metrics, referred to as Precision Availability Metrics (PAM),
   are useful for defining and monitoring SLOs.  For example, PAM can be
   used by providers and/or customers of an IETF Network Slice Service
   to assess whether the service is provided in compliance with its
   defined SLOs.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-ippm-pam-06"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.clemm-opsawg-pam-ipfix">
        <front>
          <title>Export of Flow Precision Availability Metrics Using IPFIX</title>
          <author fullname="Alexander Clemm" initials="A." surname="Clemm">
            <organization>Futurewei</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
            <organization>Orange</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Greg Mirsky" initials="G." surname="Mirsky">
            <organization>Ericsson</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="7" month="July" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document defines a set of IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
   Information Elements to export precision availability data associated
   with Flows, specifically Flows that are associated with stringent
   Service Level Objectives (SLOs) such as latency or packet delay
   variation.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-clemm-opsawg-pam-ipfix-00"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.liu-opsawg-ipfix-network-slice">
        <front>
          <title>Export of Network Resource Partition (NRP) Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
          <author fullname="Yao Liu" initials="Y." surname="Liu">
            <organization>ZTE</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="28" month="June" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   This document introduces new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
   Information Elements to identify the Network Resource Partition (NRP)
   that the network slice traffic is related with.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-network-slice-00"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability">
        <front>
          <title>Scalability Considerations for Network Resource Partition</title>
          <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Zhenbin Li" initials="Z." surname="Li">
            <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Liyan Gong" initials="L." surname="Gong">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Guangming Yang" initials="G." surname="Yang">
            <organization>China Telecom</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Jim Guichard" initials="J." surname="Guichard">
            <organization>Futurewei Technologies</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Gyan Mishra" initials="G. S." surname="Mishra">
            <organization>Verizon Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Fengwei Qin" initials="F." surname="Qin">
            <organization>China Mobile</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T." surname="Saad">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V. P." surname="Beeram">
            <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
          </author>
          <date day="2" month="June" year="2023"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>   The IETF Network Slice aims to offer connectivity services to a
   network slice customer with specific Service Level Objectives (SLOs)
   and Service Level Expectations (SLEs) over a common underlay network.
   A Network Resource Partition (NRP) is a set of network resources that
   are allocated from the underlay network to carry a specific set of
   network slice service traffic and meet specific SLOs and SLEs.

   As the demand for IETF Network Slice increases, scalability would
   become an important factor for the deployment of IETF Network Slices.
   Although the scalability of IETF Network Slices can be improved by
   mapping a group of IETF Network Slices to one NRP, that design may
   not be suitable or possible for all deployments, thus there are
   concerns about the scalability of NRPs.

   This document discusses some scalability considerations about NRPs in
   the network control and data plane.  It also investigates a set of
   optimization mechanisms.

            </t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability-02"/>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <?line 362?>

<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Thanks to Kaliraj Vairavakkalai for the comments.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
